As far as I know it's ungrammatical to use the verb form "seeing" when perception is involved - do you mean specifically the gerund seeing, or any use of to see? Either way, it sounds wrong to this US English speaker: we use "seeing" to mean "perceiving" all the time.
grammar - When is it ok to use "seeing"? - English Language Learners ...
However, I'm seeing two interpretations which are perfectly acceptable in correct English. These may not match the originally intent in the argument, but they're acceptable. Firstly, "see" can mean to determine something. "I'll see who's at the door, and I'll see whether they're here about the car." Now consider the following exchange:
They're definitely not interchangeable. If you start saying I am seeing instead of I can see, people will notice you're talking like a foreigner. I can't explain how it works grammatically, but Chandler's use of the continuous here serves to convey the question: "do you the same thing I see?" See here for a similar use of see in the present continuous.
present continuous - "I see" vs. "I am seeing" in the sense of ...
I look forward to seeing you. I look forward to meeting you. I'm looking forward to dogsledding this winter. Each of these sentences are acceptable, and use a gerund (verbal noun). You can't use other forms of the verb after the preposition to, you can't say: I'm looking forward to see you. I'm looking forward to saw you.
2: We were still seeing each other a couple of times a month The only difference is that the reference/relevance/narrative time has subtly altered. In both versions the meetings being described are in the speaker's past, but by introducing the past progressive, #2 has expanded the "potential scope" of that past. Consider...
tense - Meaning of progressive: “were seeing” vs “saw” - English ...
I’m not seeing anything now would be ok for Sarah to say; the present progressive, and more importantly, the now convey the contrast between the new and the previous states of affairs. For Alex, the simple I don’t see anything would be the most natural for (A). In any event, I think it less likely that Alex would use the now at all, because the now seems to suggest a contrast about what he ...
It felt really nice seeing all the things fall together into place. Vs It felt really nice to see all the things fall together into place. Is this just an infinite- gerund thing? Or are the mean...
(3) The debug option can be very helpful for seeing what, at first glance, looks like what a bunch of random characters does like. But this one is conventionally erroneous like the first one.
Idiomatically, What do you see? can also be taken to mean What are you capable of seeing? (As a human being, what do you see?) The answer could be the wavelengths of light observable by the human eye.
How to use the present participle of the verb to see. Can I say, "I enjoy seeing new places"?
sentence construction - Is it correct to say l enjoy seeing places ...
I'm seeing exactly what you're trying to do. Move the exactly. Then both are correct. In fact, you can use the present simple or continuous. It depends on your intention.
The debug option can be very helpful with seeing what at first glance looks like a bunch of random characters does. I expected a second "what", to parse the sentence as "The debug option can be very helpful with seeing what X does."
Similarly, removing We, leaving the participial phrase seeing the cars on the road from the helicopter does not help. This phrase does not modify they, and we have the same faulty pronoun reference problem.
What is the technical term for seeing things from someone else's perspective? Ask Question Asked 3 years, 10 months ago Modified 3 years, 10 months ago
word request - What is the technical term for seeing things from ...
The Harvard Crimson: Artist Profile: Maria ‘Bimba’ I. Carpenter ’26 on Elevating the Mundane Through Comedic Filmmaking
Maria “Bimba” I. Carpenter ’26 is a storyteller. And, to tell a story, one has to obsess over it, understand it, and live it. It’s a process that requires everything one can give it. And Carpenter — ...
Artist Profile: Maria ‘Bimba’ I. Carpenter ’26 on Elevating the Mundane Through Comedic Filmmaking
Maria Menounos revealed her secret battle with pancreatic cancer last month. Find out more about her health journey, including the treatment she received, here. Amid speculation that Maria Menounos ...
Maria is a 2024 biographical psychological drama film directed by Pablo Larraín and written by Steven Knight. It is an international co-production between Italy, Chile, Germany and the United States.
Maria Callas is one of the most iconic performers of the 20th century. The film follows the Greek-American soprano as she retreats to Paris after a glamorous and tumultuous life in the public eye, reimagining the legendary diva in her final days as she reckons with her identity and life.
Directed by Pablo Larraín and starring Academy Award®-winner Angelina Jolie as Maria Callas, MARIA reimagines the legendary diva in her final days as she reckons with her identity and life.
Academy Award winner Angelina Jolie stars as legendary opera singer Maria Callas in director Pablo Larraín's reimagining of the diva's final days. Watch trailers & learn more.
Angelina Jolie is a potential Oscar heavyweight for Netflix movie "Maria," playing opera singer Maria Callas. Here's what's real and what's not.
In Pablo Larraín’s 'Maria,' Angelina Jolie plays Maria Callas, one of the most famous opera singers of all time. Here's what the film covers—and when you can watch.
Find out how and where to watch "Maria" online on Netflix, Prime Video, and Disney+ today – including 4K and free options.
Maria Callas was a star of the stage, one of the most influential and legendary opera singers of the 20th century. Now she is a star of the screen, portrayed by Angelina Jolie in the new biopic simply titled Maria.